Faith for the Future: Who We Are
| John Wilkinson |
Third Presbyterian Church |
| April 20, 2008 |
I Peter 2:2-10 |
“The church is still a sinful
institution,’
a Benedictine monk wrote to me when
I was struggling over whether or not to
join a church.
‘How could it be otherwise?’
he asked,
and I was startled into a recognition of
simple truth.
The church is like the Incarnation itself,
a shaky proposition.
It is a human institution, full of ordinary
people,
sinners like me, who say and do cruel, stupid
things.
But it is also a divinely inspired institution,
full of good purpose,
which partakes of a unity far greater than
the sum of its parts.
That is why it is called the body of Christ.”
Kathleen Norris
Amazing Grace
As we continue to explore the values and visions that underlie
our “Faith for the Future” capital campaign, I would
call your attention to a moment in our history – approximately
one week ago. At that point, we were invited to conjure up images
in our imaginations – images of church. Some of you shared
those images with me, especially from your childhood. They are
powerful. We connected those images with two biblical images
– the church as a shepherd, offering protection and sanctuary,
and the church as rock, offering stability and steadfastness.
Perhaps we can tap our imaginations again this morning. That
is to say, what is the church for you? Now…into the future?
What is the church called to do? Who are we, and who are we
to be?
One set of responses is provided in the first letter of Peter,
which we have heard this morning. Try these on for size: “You
are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation.”
Or this image, offered by Jesus: “In my Father’s
house there are many dwelling places.”
If you’ve been to, or read about Europe, you know that
many are fretting the plight of the European church. Large,
beautiful buildings inhabited by increasingly shrinking congregations.
The church in Europe, including in those places where there
has been established a kind of national religion, holding an
increasingly marginalized cultural role.
As Europe goes, some say, so goes the U.S. I am not so sure
about that. Americans continue to indicate, in polls anyway,
that religion plays an important part in their lives, even if
that does not always equate with church-going.
At the same time, we can sense intuitively that something is
going on. Younger generations are not as compelled by the institutional
church. Denominational identification – religious brand
loyalty, if you will – is on the decrease. A real tension
exists, between the church as a kind of “voluntary association”
and as a theological enterprise and gathering of the faithful.
We live in a consumerist world, and Americans these days make
decisions about churches based on a range of factors. “Church
shopping,” it is sometimes called. Several years ago,
the noted church consultant Lyle Schaller wrote that the top
two factors people considered when looking for a church were…not
preaching, not music, not volunteer opportunities… but
parking and the nursery, with restrooms a close third!
Overlay that observation with another – the notion of
the church as the body of Christ, a body called, gathered, commissioned,
sent.
A real tension – the church as one more thing you join,
and a body to which you are joined. Your choice vs. God’s
choice.
That’s our reality, more than it ever has been. We may
not be England, or France, or Germany, but we know that church
occupies a new place on the cultural landscape. We know that
because of all that we see happening on Sunday mornings, though
that’s hardly a scientific measure. That’s our reality,
and we are called to be aware of the context, the world, into
which God has called us.
But can we dig deeper, to consider who we are and who we are
called to be in this changing, complex world?
What does it mean that we are called a chosen race and royal
priesthood and holy nation? What does it mean that we are promised
a place to live, a dwelling place, in God’s house?
One of the strongest images from the Protestant Reformation,
an image first articulated by Martin Luther and expanded on
by John Calvin, was the “priesthood of all believers,”
the notion that all have a place and a role in Christ’s
church, and that all roles are equal in their importance. No
hierarchy here!
That’s the image Peter lifts up, says Beverly Gaventa,
a house built from living stones – us – with Jesus
as the chief cornerstone, the stone upon which all building
happens. We matter, therefore, in the construction of the building,
and the building wouldn’t be the same without us. That
was important news to a small community who felt pressure from
the outside and uncertainty from the inside.
And then this – a chosen race, royal priesthood, holy
nation. Those images may seem like exclusive ones, Gaventa writes,
a kind of “I’m in, you’re out” dynamic,
to paraphrase a bit. But in a church struggling to discern who
they are, these images offer identity.
Even then, Gaventa holds out a warning: “This ‘spiritual
house’ is not a social club which exists solely for the
needs of its members,” she writes. “As much as we
belong to one another, we belong to God through Jesus…We
have a new standing – we are no longer outcasts, or marginalized
– we are chosen and precious in God’s sight…
yet we cannot convert this gift into a possession… we
cannot exclude or make our standing an exclusivist or condescending
one.” (Texts for Preaching, Year A, pages 295-297)
As we think about the next era in the life of this particular
congregation, these are important words to remember. “In
reach” and “outreach,” I like to call it.
How do we reach out in this community? To those different, and
those similar. To those from different racial and ethnic and
social groupings, to those from younger generations, or those
moving into our neighborhood, to those who may have been disaffected
from the church.
And how do we reach in? How do we connect or re-connect, in
a large and diverse congregation? How do we share our life journeys
with one another, our journeys of faith? How do we care for
one another, pray for one another, reach out and reach in to
one another? These questions matter a great deal, because as
we wrestle with the images from Peter, we wrestle with the notion
of who we are called to be.
Clearly, Peter envisioned a church that was connected, connected
spiritually, connected in deep ways, much more than a voluntary
association or social club.
Theologians Stanley Hauerwas and William Willimon offer the
term “resident alien” when describing the church
these days. We are strangers in a strange land, they assert,
residing here for a season until we inhabit our true home. “The
church is a colony,” they write, “an island of one
culture in the middle of another. In baptism our citizenship
is transferred from one dominion to another, and we become,
in whatever culture we find ourselves, resident aliens.”
(Page 12)
Is that who we are? A counter–proposal to the resident
alien model was offered in Reinhold Niebuhr’s classic
work Christ and Culture. Niebuhr went through every
possible permutation of the way that the church – called
“Christ” here – interacts with the world.
Christ opposed to culture. Christ swallowed up by culture. Christ
ignoring culture, which we have seen a bit of this week in Eldorado,
Texas. Christ fighting with culture, which we see plenty of
every day.
The model Niebuhr embraces, though, is that of Christ transforming
culture, no resident alien, but a full participant in the world,
even as it endeavors to change the world. We can’t make
a difference in the world if we are living apart from it, Niebuhr
says. And besides, I would add, we know that in this culture,
even though religion’s role is diminishing, very few of
us are persecuted for our faith, or prevented from worshiping.
I followed with interest Pope Benedict’s U.S. visit this
week. I know that his tradition and mine continue to hold some
very fundamental disagreements on some matters about theology
and the church, including the very notion of who and what constitutes
the church. But on this trip, including his ministry regarding
sexual abuse, I was gratified. More than speaking to the culture,
it seemed, he was speaking to the church. And I could listen,
not because I am a member of that particular stream, but that
because my stream occupies one of the rooms in the dwelling
place that Jesus identifies, as does his tradition.
In that sense, it was a visit about “inreach,”
internal evangelism to that part of the church that we were
invited to overhear.
He lifted up a complex and layered image, as complex and layered
as the one we have been considering. It was more nuanced than
the one we often hear that simply states that America is a Christian
nation. Rather, Benedict echoed words from Peter, saying that
the American church is part of the Christian nation, which knows
no geographical boundaries, and that happens to resides in this
nation but is not bounded by it. That’s my take anyway,
that this church, built on the cornerstone of the Easter experience,
is called to remember who it is even as it faces new challenges
and new opportunities.
* So consider that we are a chosen race, a royal priesthood,
a holy nation.
* Consider these not to be images that set us apart from the
world, but rather that draw us into the world.
* Consider that we are called to transform culture, not despise
it or reject it, but be a salt and light, making a difference.
* Consider that wherever else in the world that we feel rejected,
or displaced, or dispossessed, we have a place here, a home,
and that home provides our core identity as we seek to live
faithfully in the world.
* Consider this calling, what Beverly Gaventa identifies as
the church’s call to “re-engage its peculiar identity
and its odd mode of being.”
* Consider that we are an “intentionally alternative household…
a unified community capable of risking hospitality.”
* And consider what that hospitality would look like, both within
our walls and beyond them.
How we live with one another matters. And how we live in the
world – even on this Earth Day weekend – matters.
Who are we? Perhaps the most familiar image is not offered
by Peter, nor even by Jesus, but by Paul, and considered by
Kathleen Norris on this morning’s bulletin cover. “Together
we are the body of Christ,” Paul wrote, “and individually
members of it.”
It is a sermon for another day – a sermon about the worth
of all, the value of every body part, the way we are called
to live and work together and particularly to care for those
places where there is pain and hardship. But for this moment,
it is a clear enough reminder.
We are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, called
not away from the world, but into it, set not apart from all
of God’s children but in the midst of them. And we are
the body of Christ, our primary identity, our calling and our
vision, for the transformation of our souls and the healing
of the nations.
Believe that. Believe that you’ve been given a place
to live, a household, and a place from which you may do the
work you are called to do, until the day when God makes all
things new. Amen.