Meeting Jesus Again
John Wilkinson Third
Presbyterian Church
September 17, 2006
Mark
8:27-38
Peter DuBois brings to his work a rare and valued combination:
extraordinary musicianship, pastoral sensitivity, strong collegiality.
Those who sing in the choir, or work with him in any way, know
that, as do all of us who have experienced Peter’s leadership.
It seems difficult to believe that Peter’s fifteenth anniversary
at Third Church occurred just a few days ago. I, for one, am
grateful beyond words for his gifts, and his willingness to
share them in the worship ministry of this congregation. You
will have the opportunity to express your gratitude, and enjoy
a piece of cake, at coffee hour following worship. Peter, all
we can do is say thank you, but know how deep our gratitude
is!
***
Sometime in the past year I was on a very early flight that
returned to Rochester the same day. Another gentleman was on
both flights as well, and since we recognized each other from
hours earlier, we greeted one another in the waiting area the
second time around.
Now in my business, one is never quite sure how to proceed
with those conversations. It can come across as a movie sequel:
“Ministers on a Plane.” This one was not quite that,
though in the course of the conversation, we mutually learned
that he was a former member of this congregation. He
seemed half expecting for me to invite him back, and I did not
disappoint!
In that same conversation, though, we drifted briefly into
another area…how I came to be a minister. Over the years,
I’ve developed shorter versions and longer versions of
that response. One take on the short version simply refers to
the fact that my father is a minister. Oftentimes, people will
give a knowing nod and that ends it. Though at the same time,
I know many people for whom a parent in ministry was precisely
the reason not to be a minister.
The longer version includes other factors. A long and gratifying
relationship to the church, from cradle to this very moment.
Meaningful connections. A sense of belonging all throughout
my growing up years. When I went to college, the vistas of the
church opened wider to me and the phrase “social justice”
was added to my lexicon.
Still, when I got to seminary, I was not quite sure what to
expect. I had been through vocational testing and psychological
testing, and apparently any flags were pink and not too red.
I knew I liked the church, loved the church, even. I didn’t
know much about theology or the Bible. Yet somehow I sensed
that this was what I was called to do.
It was, in fact, that question – what is your sense of
call? – that occupied most of my early seminary career.
It was asked a million times. I often thought that the question
itself was a bit of a problem. On many days there seemed not
to be much “sense” to this at all.
Later, in my first call, to a very little church on the North
Side of Chicago, that complexity was played out in spades. It
was the first week, if not the first month, when I moderated
a Session meeting, visited a terminally ill church member, battled
a broken sump pump and flooded church basement and preached
a sermon. If I remember correctly, the sump pump episode went
much better than the sermon.
But through it all, the deep sense that this was what I was
called to do, had not only trained for and prepared for but
was cut out to do, was present. And because that was the case,
and because I was able to, permitted to, hear that voice and
follow that path, I am grateful.
That that was not always the case for some, and now is,
and that that is still not the case for others, vexes us, and
leaves the church the poorer.
It is one of the great legacies of our Reformed and Presbyterian
tradition, the assertion that we are all called. We have insisted
that God has a plan and a purpose for everyone. It is true that
we are all called in a more general sense, called to be disciples,
called to be followers.
We will sing one of the best new hymns in the hymnal this morning,
“Today We All Are Called to Be Disciples of the Lord.”
And we believe that. Notice the list of things we are called
to do, all of us.
But we have taken that notion of vocation another step, a deeper
step. We are all called in a special way, given particular gifts
and graces, talents and abilities. The Apostle Paul’s
language speaks of everyone being given gifts that somehow fit
together for the good of the whole, the common good. These gifts
are part of who we are. They are not who we are. They do not
define us, but they do give us shape and form.
And we hope, somehow, that he gifts and abilities we have been
given, or have developed and nurtured, might have something
to do with what we do, how we spend our time, work-wise and
otherwise, although that fuller conversation, about work and
worth and how we have equated what we do with who we are, is
for another time.
But because we believe deeply that all are givens gifts to
use for the common good, our tradition has believed that though
ministry is a distinct calling, it is not a higher calling.
Walter Rauschenbusch’s formulation on the bulletin cover
reminds us of what an odd and unbalanced world it would be if
we were all ministers, and “odd” is surely an understatement!
The task for all of us is to claim our call, claim your call,
as a disciple first and then your more particular call. Whatever
the call. And in relation to your work, if you discern it is
not where you are called, to work on the tasks of discernment,
to do our best, to follow that voice so that we can live into
that lovely vision offered by Frederick Buechner: that vocation
is where your greatest joy and the world’s greatest need
meets.
That is to say, being a minister is not all that I am. There
are other more primary aspects to my vocation. But that I was
able to, permitted to, discern and follow this particular path
has been a gift for which I am grateful.
Such permission has not been available, always, to all, and
still is not for some.
Until 1953, women in the Presbyterian church who experienced
a sense of call to this work were not permitted to follow it,
were not permitted to respond fully to the spirit’s voice
– whispering or hollering. The primary argument made was
a biblical one, a few verses from Paul. The deeper argument
was 2000 years of practice and cultural and theological obstructionism.
But in 1953, a woman named Lilian Alexander wrote a letter
to the Session of the Third Presbyterian Church of Rochester,
New York. Perhaps you’ve heard of the place. And the Session
said yes, and the presbytery said yes, and the General Assembly
said yes, after two long years. And in October 1956, Margaret
Towner became the first woman ordained to ministry in the Presbyterian
Church.
That’s what we will celebrate more fully and formally
next week. Come to the conference on Saturday. Come to worship
on Sunday. Note the brochure in your bulletin. If you cannot
come for the day on Saturday, come Saturday evening to experience
“Julian.” Invite a friend.
I like to think that such a move to allow for the ordination
of women was inevitable, just as I like to think that other
changes in our ordination practices will be inevitable. But
they needed a springboard somewhere, and this was the place
for that one.
Someone asked me this week whether that vote and that decision
fifty years ago was controversial. History shows it that it
was not so much. We were, then, not fighting ordination battles
the way we are now, but then again, the cultural and religious
climate in 2006 is much different than it was in 1956.
What I did say was that just because a vote had happened, reality
did not change overnight. You may have read the Times
article of several weeks ago, regarding a kind of “stained-glass
ceiling” for placements for women in ministry. Some congregations
and locations are still wary – their minds are quickly
changed when they experience the ministry of women. Which seems
to be the point.
At the beginning of the day, and the ending, it seems much
less important for us, for the church, to establish categories
and categorical prohibitions, then it does to remove all impediments
so that those who are called to this work, who are qualified,
who can jump through the many ordination hoops, may serve in
this way.
As I have said, ministry is not a higher calling than dishwashing
or lawyering or teaching or garbage collecting or stay-at-home
parenting or engineering or playing shortstop. (Although, playing
shortstop may actually be a higher calling.) Ministry
is not a higher calling, but it is a calling, and those who
are called by the spirit to pursue it should have no obstacles
in their way.
The real question this morning is not about who may serve,
but about how all of us will answer the question posed to our
disciple forbears. “Who do you say that I am?” Jesus
asked them. We have been fussing 2000 years about the theological
ramifications of that question, and its response. Another way
to respond is this. Whoever you are, Jesus, you have transformed
my life, have claimed my commitment, and I am called to follow
you.
Scholars say that this is one of the most pivotal episodes
in the gospels. It is surely meant to help us understand who
Jesus is, but it seems as surely about who the disciples were.
There may be no more demanding words than these: “If any
want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take
up their cross and follow me.” He knows what is to come.
He continues: “For those who want to save their life will
lose it, and those who lose their life for my sake, and for
the sake of the gospel, will save it.”
There are no categorical distinctions, no qualifiers. The bar
is not set higher for any one, ministers included. But no one
gets a pass, either, ministers included. That seems to me what
Lilian Alexander understood, and what Margaret Towner and other
foremothers did, what all those saints whom we have known, in
every walk of life, who have responded in such a way and made
a difference understood and did.
When the spirit calls, invites someone to lose their life
in order to gain it, then our task is to remove all impediments
and simply get out of the way.
One aspect of next week’s celebration is rightly to give
thanks for the pioneers who helped to make women’s ordination
a possibility. An even deeper aspect is to give thanks to God,
who calls us all and gives us all gifts and graces to pursue
that call.
You may have read that three rabbis were ordained in Germany
this past Thursday, the first rabbis ordained in Germany since
World War II. Germany’s Jewish population is growing,
but rabbis serving in Germany are usually imported from other
countries. Tomas Kucera, one of those ordained, said that “For
me, that I have become a rabbi is more important than whether
I have done so in Germany, or am among the first since the Holocaust
– although it sounds good and is an important step in
history.” (Democrat and Chronicle, September
15, 2006, page 10A)
I have a hunch that Rabbi Kucera would understand ecaxtly what
we are talking about this morning. Amen.