A Little Myopia
Deborah L. Hughes
Third Presbyterian Church
April 10, 2005
Luke 24:13-35
Let’s take a step back a few days to Easter.
Well, not the glorious Easter that we celebrated here together
two Sundays ago, with brass and timpani and choirs, with children
excited by bunnies and stimulated by chocolate, and, yes, even
adults excited by --what? Memories and reunions? Expectations
and fanfare and sure indications of Spring? What is it about
Easter that causes droves of people to return to church at least
that one day of the year?
No not that Easter. Not the Easters of our childhood, or even
Easters celebrated in this millennium.
Let’s go all the way back to that first Easter—of
course, it wasn’t called that then—that first Sunday
that came after that awful Friday—not a good Friday at
all—that horrible, terrible, Friday, when Jesus was crucified.
Let’s go back to the first Easter that came three days
after the crucifixion. That day when some women went to the
tomb to attend to the body and found it missing. That day when
Simon Peter went himself to see if it was true. That day when
some of the women and men who had been Jesus’ followers
reported that they had seen the angels, too, or even Jesus himself,
not dead, but risen from the dead.
Let’s go back to that Sunday, because that’s when
we’d find the two walking together on the road from Jerusalem
to Emmaus. That was the very day, the Gospel of Luke tells us,
that they embarked on their journey.
It’s about seven miles from Jerusalem to Emmaus. Some
of it hilly, so it would take two, maybe three, hours to walk,
depending on the pace. Like walking from here almost to Fairport,
only rockier and steeper in places. No sidewalks, of course,
but no cars, either.
They were talking—a better translation might be “debating”
about what had happened.
Of course they were! What on earth were they to make of all
this! Jesus was supposed to be the Messiah. He was the One who
had come to liberate Israel! He was the One who was to draw
the people back to God, restoring the relationship between God
and God’s chosen people. Now he was gone, and what had
changed? Now, he was gone, and the Roman Empire certainly was
not changed.
Was it all a fake? Was it all a lie? Had they been fooled by
some kind of cruel hoax—putting their hopes in this man
of Nazareth? They had trusted him, believed in him, followed
him. Their lives had been changed. They had seen the lives of
others changed. And they had expected even greater changes to
come. He had confronted corrupt powers, he had charmed great
crowds. Jews and Gentiles alike responded to the truth in his
teaching. Rich and poor had come to him, believing in his healing
power.
But he had been shamed, and ridiculed, and humiliated, and
crucified. And now he was dead.
Well, was he dead? Some said they’d seen him, alive!
Not that he’d survived the crucifixion by some miracle
of strength, but that he had risen from the dead. They seemed
so totally convinced by their own experience. . . were they
confused from grief? Were they delirious? Had they loved this
man so much--invested so much hope in his life and leadership--that
they could not let him go?
And what did ‘resurrection” mean? Apparently it
was not the resuscitation of a corpse-- Jesus revived to resume
his former life and broken body until the day he might die again,
finally. No, somehow this was some new mode of being that seemed
to be spiritual to some or quite corporeal to others.
And, if he were risen from the dead, what would be the point
of all that? What was the point to a Messiah—to a presumed
political and religious leader—if he wasn’t able
to lead people here on earth? How could he restore Israel when
he had so easily been defeated by a handful of Roman guards?
How could he bring release to the captives, how could he bring
justice for the poor, how could he advocate for the widow and
the homeless? How could he call people to account for all the
ways they had strayed from God’s intent, now? What good
could come from some kind of spiritual ghost?
Can you hear the two friends wrestling with each other and
with their own hearts on the road that day? Can you imagine
what questions they might have had? What agony they might have
experienced? How crushed they might have been to have lost their
leader, to have witnessed the violence that triumphed over their
champion?
They wrestled almost 2,000 years ago, but similar wrestling
continues in the hearts and minds of people today. Just ask
our current confirmation class. They genuinely ask, what sense
are we to make of the death of Jesus of Nazareth? How are we
to receive the story of resurrection? Are we really supposed
to believe that all the rules of nature were suspended that
Easter morning? When we say “Jesus is my Lord and Savior,”
what does that actually mean?
Perhaps some of you would admit to wrestling with these same
questions—if not today, on some days during your walk
of faith. Even those of us who have been members, and elders,
and church leaders might confess to wrestling with these notions
once in awhile.
We would not be alone. According to the Barna Group about 44%
of Christians are “notional Christians.” These are
people who consider themselves to be Christian, but do not claim
they know their eternal destiny and are less likely than others
to embrace core Biblical doctrines (such as the bodily resurrection
of Jesus). (http://www.barna.org ©2005 The Barna Group,
Ltd.)
Discussions about the historical Jesus versus the Jesus of
faith have been renewed in this age by popular authors such
as Marcus Borg and John Shelby Spong and even through fiction
such as Dan Brown’s DaVinci Code and films such as Mel
Gibson’s “The Passion of Christ.”
It has been quite some time since we’ve thought of the
gospels as diaries kept by the disciples as the events occurred.
The Bible is not a series of video clips that document events
as they actually happened. Instead, we know that the stories
about Jesus were written down two generations or more after
Jesus was crucified, and that each gospel was shaped by the
writers and their audience and intended to interpret the story
in ways that would be powerful and meaningful to the current
generation.
When we ask, “did this really happen just this way?”
Probably the most honest answer would be, “We may never
know exactly what happened.”
As Marcus Borg asserts,
Did Easter nevertheless involve something happening to the
corpse of Jesus? On historical grounds, we cannot say. What
we can say, however, is from the standpoint of Christian faith
most crucial: Jesus’ followers continued to experience
him as a living reality, and in a new way, namely as having
the qualities of God. Now he could be known anywhere, and not
just in a particular place; now he was the presence which abided
with them, “Immanuel” (which means “God with
us”); now he was “seated at the right hand of God,”
participating in the power and authority of God; now they knew
him as both Lord and Christ. . . Suffice it to say that he who
was put to death because of his passion to transform culture
in the name of the Spirit was not swallowed up either by death
or culture. Indeed, Spirit triumphed over culture. (Marcus Borg,
Jesus A New Vision: Spirit, Culture, and the Life of Discipleship,
©1987, p. 185.)
William Sloane Coffin addressed a similar question about his
understanding of the miracles of Jesus:
Miracles do not a Messiah make. But a Messiah can do miracles.
If you ask me if Jesus literally raised Lazarus from the dead,
literally walked on water and changed water into wine, I will
answer, “For certain, I do not know. But this I do know:
faith must be believed before it is understood, and the more
it is lived, the more things become possible.
He goes on to share his own experience of miracles:
I can also report in home after home I have seen Jesus change
beer into furniture, sinners into saints, hate-filled relations
into loving ones, cowardice into courage, the fatigue of despair
into the buoyancy of hope. In instance after instance, life
after life, I have seen Christ be “God’s power unto
salvation,” and that’s miracle enough for me. (Coffin,
William Sloane, Credo, © 2004, Westminster John Knox Press,
p. 10.)
Faith is not a science experiment. The resurrection of Jesus
is not a thesis that can or should be proved through analysis.
In truth, if I could hand you a DVD that confirmed this story
in all its details, how many of you would doubt its authenticity,
assuming it was a Hollywood production, not journalism?
Two things revealed Jesus to Cleopas and his companion that
day. First, Jesus interpreted the Jewish scriptures for them
and placed the Messiah in a different context amidst of God’s
ongoing relationship with humanity.
We are accustomed to setting Jesus in the context of God’s
plan. We do that every year in Advent and Christmas, as we set
the stage for “Immanuel, God with Us” in the birth
of the Messiah, the prince of peace.
But what we now take for granted was once a radical, new concept,
introduced here, and in the other Gospels and the Epistles--
that Jesus really was the Messiah, the Christ, come to restore
humanity to a relationship with God in a very different way.
In Luke, go all the way back to Moses to see the plan of God
unfolding in the teaching of Jesus. In the Gospel of John, go
all the way back to the beginning of time itself: “In
the beginning was the Word. . ”
The second way that Jesus was revealed to the companions was
in the breaking of the bread. Here, the one who was their invited
guest assumed the role of host by blessing and breaking the
bread with them. And as he does so, their eyes are opened.
The image reminds us of the feeding of the five thousand, and
of the last supper with the disciples. But now, on this side
of Easter, this image clearly reminds us of the Lord’s
Supper that we share together in worship.
Now, here’s an interesting perspective: Cleopas and his
companion don’t open their own eyes. As Charles Cousar
has observed, recognition of Jesus as the Christ is “not
the end product of an intellectual or existential search by
the seeker. It is the gift of God. . .” (Brueggeman, Walter,
et al, Texts for Preaching: Year A, c 2004, p 281.)
I was a little myopic as a child.
Actually, that’s an understatement. I am nearsighted
enough that Jesus (and my own mother) could have walked right
next to me, and I might not have recognized either of them!
I’ve always identified with the blind man who opens his
eyes after Jesus touches him and looks toward people and reports
that he sees “trees walking”!
The thing about having restricted vision is that you’re
not aware of it. For me, the world was as it was. I wasn’t
aware that others perceived it differently. I didn’t think
that anyone could see the writing on the chalkboard. Surely,
we all watched the teacher make shapes with his or her hands
and tried to memorize the letters. I was fascinated by photographs
in the National Geographic or on jigsaw puzzles that showed
trees where you could actually see the individual leaves from
a distance. Look at what George Eastman was able to do with
film and optic lenses, I thought!
I wore glasses for years, but they did not fully correct my
astigmatism, so the world was a little fuzzy. I was 22 years
old before contact lenses had progressed to the point that they
could correct my vision to almost 2020. Suddenly, details were
brought into focus. And for the first time, I realized that
people really could see individual leaves on trees—it
was not a miracle of photographic equipment!
Aren’t we all a little bit myopic somewhere in our lives—some
places where we are absolutely certain that we see things just
as they are—just as everyone must see them-- because we
know we’re right! But, in fact, our eyes are closed to
the full truth.
In this sense, the road to Emmaus is a metaphor for all our
journeys—particularly our journey of faith. As Paul said
to the Corinthians, now “we see as in a glass darkly,
but then we shall see face to face. . . “
We walk the road of faith, not always knowing where we’re
going, not always knowing why. And some of the time—most
of the time, for some! We are not really aware of Christ’s
presence, or God’s presence, with us. Whether it be the
beauty and wonder of the creative world that surrounds us, or
the nudging of the Holy Spirit that draws us into unfamiliar
places, or the great teacher and healer, who is always willing
to share with us the way to live life and live it abundantly.
The two on the road had gone to Jerusalem to follow a man whom
they thought would be their Messiah. And they expected that
man, that person, to lead and rule their nation, to ascend to
power, according to the norms of that society. They got something
very, very different, and they didn’t recognize the whole
different kind of Christ
Listen to how Napolean Bonaparte perceived Jesus:
Alexander, Caesar, and Charlemagne, and I have founded great
empires, but upon what did these great creations of our genius
depend? Upon force! Jesus alone founded his empire upon love
and to this very day, millions would die for him. I think I
understand human nature, and I tell you that all these were
men, and I am a man. None else is like him. Jesus Christ was
more than a man.
As William Sloane Coffin has observed,
It is terribly important to realize that the leap of faith is
not so much a leap of thought as of action. For while in many
matters it is first we must see, and then we will act; in matters
of faith it is first we must do, and then we will know, first
we will be and then we will see. One must, in short, dare to
act wholeheartedly without certainty. . .I love the recklessness
of faith. First you leap, and then you grow wings.” (Coffin,
Credo, p. 7.)
And what truth will be revealed when we dare to walk with Christ?
Listen to these words from Daniel Barrigan:
“It is not true that creation and the human family are
doomed to destruction and loss—
This is true: For God so loved the world that God gave the only
begotten son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish,
but have everlasting life.
“It is not true that we must accept inhumanity and discrimination,
Hunger and poverty, death and destruction—
This is true: I have come that they may have life, and that
abundantly.
“It is not true that violence and hatred should have
the last word, and that war and destruction live forever—
This is true: for unto us a child is born, and unto us a son
is given,
And the government shall be upon his shoulder,
And his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
the Everlasting, the Prince of Peace.
“It is not true that we are simply victims of the powers
of evil who seek to rule the world—
This is true: To me is given authority in heaven and on earth,
and lo, I am with you , even unto the end of the world.
It is not true that we have to wait for those who are specially
gifted,
Who are the prophets of the church, before we can be peacemakers.
This is true: I will pour out my spirit on all flesh,
And your sons and your daughters shall prophesy,
Your young shall see visions,
And your old shall have dreams.
It is not true that our hopes for liberation of humankind,
of justice, of human dignity, of peace
Are not meant for this earth and for this history—
This is true: The hour comes, and it is now, that true worshippers
shall worship [God] in spirit and in truth. (Berrigan, Daniel,
Testimony: The Word Made Flesh, ©2004, Orbis Books, pp.
211-212.)
You are invited to step into Easter. Not the Easter two weeks
ago, not the Easter almost 2,000 years ago. Not the Easter of
the past, but the Easter of the present. Come, join these two
and that stranger on the road to Emmaus, on the road of faith.
If your eyes are closed, come along anyway. If your heart hasn’t
burned within you yet, come along; it will. Amen.