God and Nat King Cole
Rod Frohman Third
Presbyterian Church August 29, 2004 Hosea
2:14-20, Romans 3:21-26, Matthew 19:16-26
This summer we have been diving into the sea of humanity in
an effort to explore our human condition and the roots of an
ethically responsible and balanced life, a life that the New
Testament calls an “abundant” life.
We began by reflecting on the baptism of the Ossont twins.
Baptism is the first step toward that abundant life which begins,
as traditional Christian theology suggests, with the washing
away of original sin. But there is a disconnect for us. We noted
the difficulty of believing that the twin babies could be sinners.
Babies are blessings, we reason, not sinners So instead of thinking
of ourselves as inheritors of original sin, we might think of
ourselves as originally blessed. As a matter of fact, the idea
of original blessing is central to the archetypal creation stories
on the first pages of the Bible. God created the earth, including
humanity, blessed it, and called it good.
However, we adult humans have a puzzling tendency to ruin
the good, which is blessed by God. We, for example misuse the
natural environment as well as our bodies. This tendency led
the Hebrew people to add another legend to their primeval literature,
the story of "The Fall" into sin. In other words,
the Hebrew story tellers are saying we were
originally blessed, but somehow we couldn't handle it and, with
a large dose of hubris, we attempted to over reach or control
the Source of our blessing. This was our downfall, our slide
in to a condition called sin.
So we asked, "Which is true, are we originally blessed
or originally cursed?" Answer: both. This is our human
condition.
How then do we live with ourselves? How can we have an abundant,
ethically responsible life? Then we remembered that we have
an internal moral yardstick or conscience, to measure the distance
between our blessing and our curse, between our possibilities
and our limitations. But unfortunately we find that there are
measurements, which this moral yardstick cannot make. The internal
moral yardstick , the conscience, cannot work like an abstract
and universal standard of measurement for all situations because
the conscience is conditioned by our society. We noted that
Jesus developed a new yardstick, that of responsible love, or
situation ethics. The Christian situationalist is prepared to
compromise moral yardsticks, even the 10 commandments, when
the situation of love [of God and neighbor] seems better served
by doing so. For example, the situation of WW II led German
theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer to unsuccessfully attempt to
assassinate Hitler, a violation of the sixth commandment.
Today we are confronted with the question, "Will we always
make the right choice using Jesus' ethic of responsible love?"
The answer, honestly, is, “No”. So this matter of
the struggle between original sin and original blessing is not
just an idea, it is the human condition, it is our daily experience.
In the words of St. Paul, “We do not
do what we want to do, and we do
what we do not want to do”.
So what are we supposed to do? Are we, like King Oedipus, supposed
to poke out our eyes to pay for our human condition by some
sort of self -imposed suffering? Or do we just ignore our limitations
and shortcomings and go blithely on as if it didn't matter,
in a nostalgic re-visiting my hippie ethic of the 1960's which
said, "I'll be myself, and you be yourself and if we get
together, hey, that's groovy." Either solution; I will
ignore my blessing and pay for my sins, or ignore my sin and
focus on my blessing, has disastrous consequences.
Caught in the human condition of moral schizophrenia we think
that we can pay for our own sin. We conclude that there are
certain things that we can do to extract ourselves from this
human dilemma.
This is precisely the dilemma of the rich young ruler of our
Gospel lesson this morning. Remember who he is. He is an upper
class, well-educated, religiously sensitive male, who, because
of his social standing needed only to worry only about keeping
the 10 Commandments, not about putting food on the table. He
came to Jesus and asked, "What good deed must I do to inherit
eternal life?" That is, "What is the price of living
an ethically responsible and balanced life now and being assured
of a life hereafter?" He is an honest seeker. And he has
time on his hands.
Jesus tells him to keep the 10 Commandments. Amazingly enough
he responds that he has done exactly that.
Well then, Jesus says, If you want to meet the ultimate standard
of and ethically responsible life, then, "Sell all that
you have, give the proceeds to the poor and come and follow
me”. The gospel editor tells us that the young man went
away grieving because he had a great many possessions”,
that is, the price was not right!!
There are some things that cannot be purchased either with
money or deeds. Somehow we often think that by living according
to the rules, doing all kinds of good things like serving on
community boards and agencies, working in the church, giving
to the United Way, being responsible, that we can find a satisfying
and abundant life. The difficult thing about living an ethically
responsible, balanced, in short, “abundant life”,
either now or in the hereafter is that it can not be paid for.
We can't buy it with any type of currency be it time, talent,
treasure, even our own blood. As the Associate Pastor for Church
and Society this kind of statement sounds like I am shooting
myself in the foot. Indeed tomorrow morning when I call someone
to volunteer for the food cupboard I might hear my words being
quoted back to me, “ Rod, if volunteering doesn’t
get me anything, why do it.?
But all this goes beyond volunteering. We’re stuck aren’t
we? We are stuck between a rock and a hard place—the rock
of our own hubris and the hard place of our failure—the
rock of our own self-delusion that somehow, our intelligence,
our technology, our superior management skills, our commitment,
our love, will somehow bring in the peaceable kingdom --- and
the hard place of our failure to make it happen. We are stuck
–we are captive to our human condition, we often grow
weary in our well-doing and so the easiest reaction is to just
blow off the initial commitment to an ethically responsible
life. Because we cannot do it or because responsible living
requires strength to live beyond rules and in the zone of love
of neighbor and God, we may reject it. Since this following
of Jesus seems like selling all that we have we are tempted
to just go away sad. The price was not right. We had a great
love for Christ and his kingdom. We who love justice just ramble
sadly off unable to pay the high price of fidelity as a disciple
of Jesus Christ.
Do you remember that Nat King Cole song "Ramblin’
Rose"?
Redemption, recognize that word? It is not a word we use very
often any more. We used to redeem S & H Green stamps for
home products. I like to redeem my Red Wings ticket stub for
a $ .99 discount at the Wendys. In the New Testament "redemption"
(apolutrosis) is a frequently used word meaning, "'setting
free by a ransom' and is used in conjunction with a ransom paid
for prisoners of war, slaves and criminals condemned to death.”
(Kittel, Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, Vol. 4.
p. 353) It is a visceral metaphor, this redemption. The redemption
of a slave or a criminal in the public square of Corinth, Athens,
or Thessalonikia was a sight common in the New Testament world.
To be caught between our original blessing and original sin
is slavery to the human condition of moral schizophrenia. And
there is no method by which we ourselves can work our way or
pay our way out of it. This is where salvation in Christ is
applied. We have been bought by Another and have been given
our freedom papers. The ransomed slave metaphor is the way Paul
explains what God has done for us in Jesus Christ in Christ's
death on the Cross.
The big question is. "Do we believe this?" Do we
have faith that this is true? By faith I do not mean some creed
or some doctrine. I do not mean orthodox belief. I do not mean
church membership. Faith is trusting this announcement of ransom
and accepting a rebuilt relationship with God. Faith is something
relational. It isn't something God has or I have, [and listen
carefully here] but something between the two of us. It is a
relationship re-knit. In Christ God gives, not just a benefit,
but God gives God's self to us. And in trust we give ourselves
back to God.
Ultimately only God can love like this. Provisionally we can
say it to each other, but sooner or later we will take it back.
There are limits to human love and commitment. Operating in
the form of our original blessing we will eventually run out
of patience and love and cross over into impatience, infidelity,
apathy or even hate. It happens all too often. Ultimately only
God can love us permanently and unconditionally and viscerally.
God has gone out into the street, paid the pimp and welcomes
us back despite our unfaithfulness. We no longer have to justify
our lives. God wants to give us true partnership, true selfhood.
This is the relationship for which we were originally made.
God stands with arms outstretched in welcome. And God's outstretched
arms have the shape of a Cross.